Files
pay/internal/reconcile/sync_test.go
T
wangjia 04c3f4f31a feat(v2): 对账主体——周期查单收敛 + 已付订单抽查 + 退款修复扫描/卡滞告警 + main 装配 reconcile Runner
Task 5(债务 #6):两条腿收敛对账——① SyncPendingTask 调度 P2 gateway.SyncPendingAttempts
逐 pending attempt 查单收敛(防掉单);② PaidSpotCheckTask 对近期已付 attempt 反查渠道
核对金额/币种,漂移(渠道侧已退款/拒付而本地仍 paid)只告警不改状态。

追加两条 P4 T3 opus review 义务(该 review 产出时本 worktree 已分叉,P4 退款主体在主
checkout;这里对本 worktree 已有的 store.RefundStore/OrderStore 接口——P4 T2,在 base
里——建自愈扫描,设计为可在合并 P4 后继续工作):
- RefundApplyTask:退款修复扫描,重算 succeeded 退款之和,自愈「退款成功但订单卡 paid」
  的崩溃窗口(MarkRefundStatus 翻 succeeded 后、ApplyRefundToOrder 调用前崩溃)。候选订单
  =有 succeeded 退款的订单 ∪ 当前处于 refunding/partially_refunded 态的订单;走既有
  ApplyRefundToOrder 条件 UPDATE,目标态与当前态一致时跳过,天然幂等。
- RefundStuckAlertTask:卡滞 processing/manual_pending 退款超阈值(默认 30min)打 WARN,
  只观测不改状态;渠道退款查询 API 面留待后续。

main 装配前 4 job(order-expire/usage-refresh/sync-pending/paid-spotcheck)+ 上述两个退款
job 挂上 reconcile.Runner;acctPicker 的 limit_aware 用量源改用 reconcile.NewUsageSource
替 NopUsage。crypto 冷启动 Warm/孤儿扫描(AddCryptoJobs)留给 Task 6 追加。

config.go 新增 ReconcileConfig(含 Task 6 预留的 orphan_* 字段)+ 默认值;crypto.go 补
SetReservationLoader 构造后注入 setter(Task 6 依赖)。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013nMthbVEmQquxBRKb9Fj8u
2026-07-10 17:45:01 +08:00

73 lines
2.8 KiB
Go

package reconcile_test
import (
"context"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/wangjia/pay/config"
"github.com/wangjia/pay/internal/accounts"
"github.com/wangjia/pay/internal/gateway"
"github.com/wangjia/pay/internal/model"
"github.com/wangjia/pay/internal/provider"
"github.com/wangjia/pay/internal/provider/fake"
"github.com/wangjia/pay/internal/reconcile"
"github.com/wangjia/pay/internal/store"
)
type stubResolver struct{}
func (stubResolver) Resolve(sku, currency string) (int64, string, string, error) {
return 29990000, "Pro", "pro_year", nil
}
type nopEnq struct{}
// Enqueue 签名依当前仓库 gateway.WebhookEnqueuer(4 个 string + map;brief 草稿只写 3 个 —
// P4 T2 之后加了 refundID 参数,此处适配现状,见 task-5-report.md 记录的漂移)。
func (nopEnq) Enqueue(_, _, _, _ string, _ map[string]any) error { return nil }
func TestSyncPendingTaskSettlesViaQuery(t *testing.T) {
db := model.OpenTestDB(t)
orders := store.NewOrderStore(db)
preg := provider.NewRegistry()
fp := fake.New()
preg.Register(fp)
areg := accounts.New([]config.AccountConfig{{AccountID: "fake-a1", Channel: "fake", Region: "global", Enabled: true}})
gw := gateway.New(orders, preg, accounts.NewRouter(areg, nil, nil), stubResolver{}, nopEnq{}, "global")
res, _ := gw.CreateOrder(context.Background(), gateway.CreateOrderInput{SKU: "pro_year", Method: "fake", BizSystem: "pangolin", BizRef: "u-1"})
atts, _ := orders.ListAttemptsByStatus(model.AttemptPending, 10)
fp.SetQueryResult(atts[0].ProviderRef, provider.PaidEvent{
ProviderRef: atts[0].ProviderRef, Status: provider.PaidSucceeded, PaidAmountMinor: 29990000, PaidCurrency: "USDT"})
task := reconcile.SyncPendingTask(gw, 50)
if err := task(context.Background()); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("task: %v", err)
}
o, _ := orders.GetOrder(res.OrderNo)
if o.Status != model.OrderPaidV2 {
t.Fatalf("查单对账后应 paid, got %v", o.Status)
}
_ = time.Second
}
func TestPaidSpotCheckTaskRunsCleanOnConsistent(t *testing.T) {
db := model.OpenTestDB(t)
orders := store.NewOrderStore(db)
preg := provider.NewRegistry()
fp := fake.New()
preg.Register(fp)
now := time.Date(2026, 7, 10, 12, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
paid := now.Add(-10 * time.Minute)
_ = orders.CreateAttempt(&model.Attempt{OutTradeNo: "O1", Channel: "fake", ProviderRef: "R-O1",
AmountMinor: 100, Currency: "USDT", Status: model.AttemptPaid, PaidAt: &paid})
// 渠道侧查单仍报 succeeded 同额 → 一致,无告警。
fp.SetQueryResult("R-O1", provider.PaidEvent{ProviderRef: "R-O1", Status: provider.PaidSucceeded, PaidAmountMinor: 100, PaidCurrency: "USDT"})
task := reconcile.PaidSpotCheckTask(orders, preg, time.Hour, func() time.Time { return now })
if err := task(context.Background()); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("spotcheck: %v", err) // 只求不报错、不 panic;漂移检测走日志
}
}